Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3097 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 144 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Xeon E3-1220 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 69 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
