Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3610 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G550 - 187 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $35.83 vs $102.36
- Up to 61% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.24 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14539 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
165
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |