Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600HS outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600HS is 2402 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Core i3-3250 - 112 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €45.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |