Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 1588 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-6100 - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |