Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 2828 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than FX-8320 - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4600G - $54.71 vs $76.05
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €84.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74178 minutes ago
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |