Buy on Amazon
€55.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 3409 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 6% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G1610 - 219 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4500 - $27.05 vs $50.16
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for €55.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74478 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 4500
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.395498392282956%
Multi-Core
739
11.921277625423455%
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.