Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Xeon E5-1620 v4

Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Xeon E5-1620 v4: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

3.8 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4

Buy for 136.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3902 minutes ago

vs

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3

Buy for 188.4 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3899 minutes ago

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

3.8 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4

Buy for 136.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3902 minutes ago

vs

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3

Buy for 188.4 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3899 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

  • Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 118 FPS
  • Up to 28% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $122.92 vs $169.73
  • Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $1.09 vs $1.6 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

125

100%

Value, €/FPS

€1.09/FPS

100%

Price, €

€136.44

100%

FPS and Value Winner

CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4

Buy for 136.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3902 minutes ago

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


FPS

118

94.39999999999999%

Value, €/FPS

€1.6/FPS

68.125%

Price, €

€188.4

72%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3

Buy for 188.4 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3899 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1704

100%

Multi-Core

7222

100%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


Single-Core

1088

63.84976525821596%

Multi-Core

3898

53.973968429797836%

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

vs

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4

Jul 7th, 2019
Release DateJun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5CollectionXeon E5
MatisseCodenameBroadwell-E/EP
AMD Socket AM4SocketIntel Socket 2011-3
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6
Cores4
12
Threads8
3.8 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed3.8 GHz
95 W
TDP140 W
7 nm
Process Size14 nm
38.0x
Multiplier35.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.