Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6300 - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $42.44 vs $122.92
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $0.41 vs $1.0 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €136.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
83.94160583941606%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |