Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-7400T - 171 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $38.03 vs $153.55
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 3600X - $0.26 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
162
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |