Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 206% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 211 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $39.15 vs $138.93
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €154.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74794 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
37.51522533495737%
Multi-Core
1051
15.014285714285712%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |