Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1893 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4150 - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $32.9 vs $60.68
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.18 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €67.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5522 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
199
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |