Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 733 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930T - 176 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
170
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |