Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $91.24 vs $182.06
- Up to 47% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900KF - $0.62 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 3400G - 173 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
163
94.21965317919076%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
52.991452991452995%
Price, €
€202.09
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
63.98184912081679%
Multi-Core
3619
39.53462967008958%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |