Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Ryzen 5 3400G - 121 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
109
90.08264462809917%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.30310262529832%
Multi-Core
3619
42.95039164490861%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |