Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $71.77 vs $73.09
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen 5 3400G - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €79.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2204 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
98%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |