Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 277 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $73.84 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 3400G - 179 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76378 minutes ago
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
88.54003139717426%
Multi-Core
3619
48.55111349610947%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |