Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $73.1 vs $190.11
- Up to 52% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.54 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 187 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 20 vs 12 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
149
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16496 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
47%
Price, €
€211.02
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |