Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $73.1 vs $1023.66
- Up to 92% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-13700F - $0.81 vs $10.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 5 2600X - 113 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
100
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.06/FPS
8%
Price, €
€1136.26
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,136.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |