Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2004 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than FX-8350 - 56 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-8350 - $61.7 vs $133.09
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €68.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |