Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $102.37 vs $168.17
- Up to 37% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-11900F - $0.49 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 239 vs 231 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
231
96.65271966527197%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57555 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
62.82051282051282%
Price, €
€186.67
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57553 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
53.06310456011055%
Multi-Core
4841
52.78595573001854%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |