Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $62.7 vs $584.23
- Up to 89% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10920X - $0.35 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen 5 2600 - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6409 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
10%
Price, €
€648.49
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €648.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |