Buy on Amazon
€117.65
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 3103 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-960.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-960 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-960 - $105.99 vs $160.86
- Up to 37% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-960 - $0.88 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-960 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2600BBAFBOX
Buy for €117.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-960 Processor 3.20 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366
Buy for €178.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i7-960
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.