Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $102.37 vs $231.58
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 2600 - 193 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74980 minutes ago
Buy for €257.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
43.291995490417136%
Multi-Core
4841
31.2827140549273%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |