Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $102.37 vs $233.97
- Up to 50% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700 - $0.58 vs $1.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than Ryzen 5 2600 - 224 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
197
87.94642857142857%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1575 minutes ago
Buy for €259.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
43.76899696048632%
Multi-Core
4841
32.800325225286265%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |