Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 1417 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 2600 - 256 vs 254 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $39.49 vs $102.37
- Up to 62% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.17 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
254
99.21875%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
37.77777777777778%
Price, €
€113.63
38%
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2045 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |