Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 471 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 15% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 164 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $37.73 vs $62.7
- Up to 47% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.26 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3331 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |