Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $57.77 vs $105.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.58 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €117.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |