Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 167 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $62.7 vs $144.51
- Up to 56% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.52 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
134
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17935 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
44%
Price, €
€160.41
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17935 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |