Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 824 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $62.7 vs $252.88
- Up to 74% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $0.41 vs $1.56 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3793 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
26%
Price, €
€280.7
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €280.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |