Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8300 - 170 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $81.91 vs $105.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.58 vs $0.69 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €117.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |