Buy on Amazon
€86.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1105 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Pentium G4400 - 212 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $69.68 vs $77.85
- Up to 10% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.37 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
90.2439024390244%
Price, €
€86.41
89%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32302 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
208
98.11320754716981%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.35
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400 3.3 GHz FCLGA1151
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
62.9193109700816%
Multi-Core
1184
31.149697448039987%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.