Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 225 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $77.85 vs $405.12
- Up to 79% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9900T - $1.63 vs $7.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2500X - 59 vs 53 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
53
89.83050847457628%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33042 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.62/FPS
21.391076115485564%
Price, €
€449.68
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €449.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
76.97138869504536%
Multi-Core
3801
63.41341341341341%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |