Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1863 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $77.85 vs $318.79
- Up to 71% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-14900KF - $0.43 vs $1.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 2500X - 239 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
202
84.51882845188284%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32318 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
29.054054054054053%
Price, €
€353.86
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
35.489060489060485%
Multi-Core
3801
18.063872255489024%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |