Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1863 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $77.85 vs $320.62
- Up to 54% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900K - $0.27 vs $0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 87% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 605 vs 323 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
323
53.388429752066116%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32444 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
45.76271186440678%
Price, €
€355.89
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €355.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
35.569171235085456%
Multi-Core
3801
18.099999999999998%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |