Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1151 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $77.85 vs $169.63
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-12900KF - $0.58 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2500X - 162 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
149
91.9753086419753%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31975 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
50%
Price, €
€188.29
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
43.39103068450039%
Multi-Core
3801
25.542638263557553%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |