Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1212 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $77.85 vs $301.2
- Up to 70% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-12900 - $0.36 vs $1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 18% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 5 2500X - 282 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
240
85.1063829787234%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32538 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
282
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
30.252100840336134%
Price, €
€334.33
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €334.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
44.60169834209462%
Multi-Core
3801
29.139834406623734%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |