Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 598 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $77.85 vs $358.28
- Up to 78% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10900K - $0.12 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 5 2500X - 734 vs 701 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
701
95.50408719346049%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33039 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
734
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
22.22222222222222%
Price, €
€397.69
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €397.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
63.064608347627214%
Multi-Core
3801
41.4820473644003%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |