Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 598 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $65.78 vs $182.8
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900F - $0.49 vs $1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 2500X - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 20 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
149
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
37%
Price, €
€202.91
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |