Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 225 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $77.85 vs $160.86
- Up to 49% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-9700 - $0.5 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 2500X - 180 vs 174 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
174
96.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32017 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
50.505050505050505%
Price, €
€178.56
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €178.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32018 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
70.88688946015425%
Multi-Core
3801
61.13881293228245%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |