Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 832 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $77.85 vs $91.4
- Up to 12% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6900K - $0.64 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 5 2500X - 139 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
135
97.12230215827337%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32852 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
87.67123287671234%
Price, €
€101.45
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
88.09904153354633%
Multi-Core
3801
53.399831413318346%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |