Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 1470 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-5930K - $77.85 vs $402.12
- Up to 80% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-5930K - $0.39 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than Ryzen 5 2500X - 223 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
222
99.55156950672645%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33004 minutes ago
Buy for €446.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
95.41522491349481%
Multi-Core
3801
69.36131386861314%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |