Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1470 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $77.85 vs $314.37
- Up to 75% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-5820K - $0.32 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 270 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
269
99.62962962962963%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33206 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
270
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
24.8062015503876%
Price, €
€348.95
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
95.08620689655173%
Multi-Core
3801
69.83281278706596%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |