Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 598 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $77.85 vs $154.98
- Up to 46% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.48 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
181
93.78238341968913%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32322 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
53.93258426966292%
Price, €
€172.03
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €172.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
64.88235294117646%
Multi-Core
3801
47.02461957194111%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |