Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 598 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 242 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $76.77 vs $77.85
- Up to 3% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.35 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
238
98.34710743801654%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
97.22222222222221%
Price, €
€86.41
98%
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32543 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
76.70375521557719%
Multi-Core
3801
66.09285341679708%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |