Buy on Amazon
€86.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1512 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $77.85 vs $185.81
- Up to 58% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-4160 - $0.64 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32845 minutes ago
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
41.830065359477125%
Price, €
€206.25
41%
Intel Core I3-4160 Processor 3.60 GHz, 2-Core LGA1150 Socket, Hyper-Threading (BX80646I34160)
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32842 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
96.46418857660925%
Multi-Core
2072
54.51197053406999%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.