Buy on Amazon
€86.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $97
Availability
MSRP in USD: $97
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1233 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2500X - 194 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $55.95 vs $77.85
- Up to 37% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.32 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 58 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
169
87.11340206185567%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
62.745098039215684%
Price, €
€86.41
71%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32761 minutes ago
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ 12th Gen i3-12100F desktop processor, featuring PCIe Gen 5.0 & 4.0 support, DDR5 and DDR4 support. Discrete graphics required.
Buy for €62.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
49.573033707865164%
Multi-Core
3801
50.97224084752582%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.