Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 615 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 45% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930 - 160 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Diablo IV than Celeron G3930 - $0.54 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $64.34 vs $77.85
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33036 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
68.75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
83.07692307692308%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.12239347234814%
Multi-Core
1043
27.440147329650095%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |