Buy on Amazon
€86.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 2107 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1610 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $27.05 vs $77.85
- Up to 62% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.26 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
38.23529411764706%
Price, €
€86.41
34%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32854 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
92.1259842519685%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.