Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 441 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $77.85 vs $782.37
- Up to 90% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.47 vs $4.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen 5 2500X - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 48 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
182
98.37837837837839%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33044 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.69/FPS
10.021321961620467%
Price, €
€868.43
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €868.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
66.16676664667067%
Multi-Core
3801
28.54246451903582%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |