Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 441 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $77.85 vs $355.32
- Up to 77% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.5 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 2500X - 182 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
174
95.6043956043956%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32766 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
23.04147465437788%
Price, €
€394.41
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
64.73004694835682%
Multi-Core
3801
35.53664921465969%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |